Understanding the Effectiveness of Google's Organizational Design in Pursuing Sustainable Innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2222/9ge60133Keywords:
Google, Organizational Culture, Sustainable InnovationAbstract
This paper explores the effectiveness of Google’s organizational design in fostering sustainable innovation. The challenge of achieving and maintaining continuous innovation, crucial for developing new business models and products, is a significant concern for many companies. Historical evidence suggests that organizations often lose their innovative edge over time despite initial successes. Assessing innovation capability involves evaluating a company’s success in product launches and its capacity to learn from failures and persist in its innovation efforts. From a firm-level perspective, the characteristics of an organization, including its structure, culture, and processes, are critical for sustaining innovation in rapidly changing industries. Google exemplifies a company that has consistently demonstrated its ability to innovate. Its matrix organizational structure, which promotes flexibility and cross-divisional collaboration, enhances its capacity for continuous innovation. Google’s organizational culture supports this with practices that encourage creativity and employee satisfaction, such as allowing pets at work and providing on-site childcare. By balancing internal and external collaboration, Google effectively sustains its innovative edge, showcasing the importance of a supportive organizational framework and culture in achieving long-term success.
Downloads
References
Alange, S. and Steiber, A. 2009. The board’s role in sustaining major organizational change. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences. Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 280-293.
Ahlstrom, D. dan Bruton G.D. 2010. International Management: Strategy and Culture in the Emerging World. South-western.
Christensen, C. 1997. The Innovator’s Dilemma. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
Hamel, G. dan Breen, B. 2007. The Future of Management. Harvard Business Press, 2007
Kinicki, A. dan Fugate, M. 2018. Organizational Behavior: A Practical, Problem-Solving Approach. McGrawHill: New York.
Matzler, K., Bailom, F., Anschober, M. and Richardson, S. 2010, Sustaining corporate success: what drives the top performers?. Journal of Business Strategy. Vol. 31 No. 5, pp. 4-13.
Negara, W. P. K. (2024). Social media marketing and purchase decision: Insights from Indonesian MSMEs. Journal of Enterprise and Development (JED), 6(2), 476–487. https://doi.org/10.20414/jed.v6i2.10942
Smithson, Nathaniel. 2018. Google’s Organizational Structure & Its Characteristics (An Analysis). Panmore Institute, 8 September. Diakses pada 10 Mei 2020. http://panmore.com/google-organizational-structure-characteristics-analysis
Steiber, A., dan Alange, S. 2013. A corporate system for continuous innovation: the case of Google Inc. European Journal of Innovation Management. Vol. 16 No. 2, 2013 pp. 243-264
Theorg.com. 2020. Google. The Org, tanpa tanggal dan bulan. Diakses pada 11 Mei 2020. https://theorg.com/org/google
Thesisleader. 2020. Google Inc. Thesis Leader, tanpa tanggal & bulan. Diakses pada 10 Mei 2020. https://thesisleader.com/essays/google-inc/
Weightman, J. 2004. Managing People. CIPD Publishing
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Synergy in Economic & Business Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.